Background Information
Performer Bios

Poet/Composer Bios

Additional Information

ca. 1733 ca. 1741 1746 1747 1748 1750

The Portrait of Bach That Was Lost In World War Two -
An Authentic "Alternative" to the Haussmann Image of Johann Sebastian Bach in his early 60s
Pages at
The Face Of Bach

Page 1

The Face Of Bach

This remarkable photograph is not a computer generated composite; the original of the Weydenhammer Portrait Fragment, all that remains of the portrait of Johann Sebastian Bach that belonged to his pupil Johann Christian Kittel, is resting gently on the surface of the original of the 1748 Elias Gottlob Haussmann Portrait of Johann Sebastian Bach.

1092-18A-0635.jpg  Loading 64973 bytes
1748 Elias Gottlob Haussmann Portrait, Courtesy of William H. Scheide, Princeton, New Jersey
Weydenhammer Portrait Fragment, ca. 1733, Artist Unknown, Courtesy of the Weydenhammer Descendants
Photograph by Teri Noel Towe
©Teri Noel Towe, 2001, All Rights Reserved

The Portrait of Bach That Was Lost In World War Two
An Authentic "Alternative" to the Haussmann Image
of Johann Sebastian Bach in his early 60s

1959BesselerA6woc0550.jpg  Loading 68353 bytes
Page 1


During the first weeks of my sophomore year at Deerfield Academy, in Deerfield, Massachusetts, in the fall of 1963, I stumbled across, in a green buckram bound copy of back issues of The Musical Quarterly, Prof. Gerhard Herz's meticulous, perceptive, and scrupulously fair assessment of Heinrich Besseler's controversial and flawed but undeniably important monograph on the Bach portraits, Fünf Echte Bildnisse Johann Sebastian Bachs (Cassel, 1956), 1714-jerda-jsb-besseler-oofc-nocc-475.jpg  Loading 64868 bytes.

The illustrations that accompanied the Gerhard Herz review included two portraits of Bach that I had never seen before, the image on the left that is sometimes referred to as the Berlin Portrait, because it was in an art gallery in Berlin that it was first spotted in 1941, and the image on the right, the 1791 David copy of the 1746 Haussmann Portrait, both of which disappeared during World War II and both of which were then assumed to have been destroyed in the bombings:

1745-berlin-jsb-wn-B10-s-550.jpg  Loading 81743 bytes1746-1791EGHJSB-wn-B3-0550.jpg  Loading 81746 bytes

While I learned in late March, 2001, from my friend and esteemed colleague, Christoph Wolff, that the David portrait did, in fact, survive the War, recently had been located, and now is in the collection of the Bach Archiv in Leipzig, the Berlin Portrait, last known to have been in the possession of a wealthy collector in the Ruhr Valley, disappeared during the saturation bombings in 1944 and still has not reappeared, at least to my knowledge, and certainly to my disappointment.

I shall defer a discussion of the David copy for another day; for the present I shall only say that I consider this painting to be a vastly undervalued and underappreciated image, and one that is essential to any examination of the convoluted, enigmatic, and unhappy history of the 1746 Haussmann Portrait. I must also say, however, that the more I study it the more I find myself wondering if this remarkable painting is not an authentic "synthesis" of the 1746 and the 1748 Haussmann portraits

But I find that I can no longer postpone an examination of the Berlin Portrait. Like the Volbach Portrait, this painting, which survives only in a couple of less than satisfactory photographs, small in size and over-exposed, from the catalogues of a couple of Berlin art dealers, has haunted me and fascinated me for many years.

Is the Berlin Portrait, in fact, an accurate depiction of the facial features of Johann Sebastian Bach? If so, why was it painted and for whom? And who was the artist? At least on the basis of the admittedly less than satisfactory photogravure which is the only image with which we have to work, whoever that painter was, he or she arguably was not an artist of the calibre of Elias Gottlob Haussmann or the as yet unidentified painter who was responsible for the Weydenhammer Portrait Fragment, which, as I have proven beyond a reasonable doubt elsewhere here at The Face Of Bach, is all that remains of the long lost portrait of Bach that belonged to his pupil Johann Christian Kittel.

Normally, a scholarly examination of this kind would begin with a discussion of the provenance of the painting, but I am going to take the liberty of putting the evidentiary cart before the scholarly horse, if I may, because, as those of you who have read The Queens College Lecture already know, it is my contention that the primary issue is the accuracy of the depiction of the facial features. After all, if it isn't Bach's face, its provenance is not important. Once the depiction is determined to be an accurate description of the face, however, the question of the portrait's provenance takes on great importance.

Please click on 1959BrA60100link.jpg  Loading 38510 bytes to go on to Page 2.

Please click on 1092-18A-0100v.jpg  Loading 35034 bytes to return to the Index Page at The Face Of Bach.

Please click on abdyjsb2.jpg to visit the Johann Sebastian Bach Index Page at Teri Noel Towe's Homepages.

Please click on the crabby2.jpg to visit the Teri Noel Towe Welcome Page.

Copyright, Teri Noel Towe, 2000 , 2002
Unless otherwise credited, all images of the Weydenhammer Portrait:  Copyright, The Weydenhammer Descendants, 2000
All Rights Reserved

The Face Of Bach
Remains Profoundly Grateful to
The Rainbow Flag Civic Center

For Providing the Cyberspace for The Face Of Bach
For the First Eight Years of Its Existence.
Thank you, Nathan P. Johansen!
The Face Of Bach
Now Is Profoundly Grateful to
The Bach Cantatas Website

For Providing The Face Of Bach
With a New Home.
Thank you, Aryeh Oron!

The Face Of Bach is a PPP Free Early Music website.
192mammuthusimp.jpg  Loading 50906 bytes
The Face Of Bach
has received the HIP Woolly Mammoth Stamp of Approval from
The HIP-ocrisy Home Page.

ca. 1733 ca. 1741 1746 1747 1748 1750


Back to the Top

Last update: Sunday, July 02, 2017 03:50